Goldfried, M.R., Castonguay, L.G.,
Hayes, A.M., Drozd, J.F., & Shapiro, D.A. (1997). A comparative
analysis of the therapeutic focus in cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal
sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
65, 740-748.
This study compared therapeutic
foci in a sampling of 30 cognitive-behavioral and 27 psychodynamic-interpersonal
manual-driven treatments for depression. High- and low-impact
sessions were coded for each client, with the Coding System of Therapeutic
Focus. Results indicated that psychodynamic-interpersonal
sessions focused more on such variables as emotion, patterns, incongruities,
the impact that others made on clients, clients' expected reaction
of others, the tendency to avoid therapeutic progress, therapists
themselves, clients' parents, and links between people and time
periods in clients' lives. Cognitive-behavioral sessions
placed greater emphasis on external circumstances and clients' ability
to make decisions, gave more support and information and encouraged
between-session experiences, and focused more on the future.
Relatively few differences emerged as a function of session impact.
Results are discussed in terms of the different and similar theoretical
conceptions of the change process.
back
to top
Hardy, G.E., Shapiro, D.A., &
Borrill, C.S. (1997). Fatigue in the workforce of National Health
Service Trusts: Levels of symptomatology and links with minor psychiatric
disorder, demographic, occupational and work role factors. Journal
of Psychosomatic Research, 43, 83-92.
The aims of this study were: (1)
to obtain a systematic estimate of the levels of fatigue in representative
samples of the major occupational groups of health care workers;
(2) to examine the relationship between fatigue and mental health
as a function of occupational and work role factors; and (3) to
test the proposition that fatigue arises from a combination of poor
mental health and high job stress. Questionnaire data from
7720 NHS Trust staff was used. Higher levels of fatigue were
reported among health care workers in comparison with general population
figures. Highest levels of general fatigue, the subjective
sensation of tiredness, were experienced by doctors (especially
women doctors), professions allied to medicine and managers.
Highest levels of fatigability, the onset of symptoms after exertion,
were experienced by ancillary and nursing staff. Both general
fatigue and fatigability were associated with high levels of psychological
distress. Support was also found for the proposition that
fatigue arises from a combination of poor mental health and high
work demands.
back
to top
Taylor, E., Folkard, S., &
Shapiro, D.A. (1997). Shiftwork advantages as predictors of health.
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health,
3, S20-S29.
This study investigated the relationships
between shiftwork advantages and subjective health. The Standard
Shiftwork Index and a measure of Shiftwork advantages were completed
by 175 shift workers. Four advantage subscales were developed,
corresponding to family, social/domestic, work, and time for oneself.
Family advantages were negatively associated with psychological
distress, cognitive and somatic anxiety, chronic fatigue, and digestive
and cardiovascular symptoms ( p < 0.05). After family advantages
were partialled out, social/domestic advantages were negatively
related to psychological distress ( p < 0.05). Variety
in work on each shift was significantly related to psychological
distress and digestive symptoms. After the effects of shift
and personality characteristics were accounted for, family advantages
predicted a significant amount of the variance of cognitive anxiety
( p < 0.05) and chronic fatigue ( p < 0.01), and variety in
work, family, and social/domestic advantages predicted a significant
amount of variance of psychological distress ( p < 0.05).
The authors conclude that family advantages are related to psychological
health, and to a lesser extent physical health, but that other advantages
have little relationship to subjective health.
back
to top
Wall, T.D., Bolden, R.I., Borrill,
C.S., Carter, A.J., Golya, D.A., Hardy, G.E., Haynes, C.E., Rick,
J.E., Shapiro, D.A., & West, M.A. (1997). Minor psychiatric
disorder in NHS Trust staff: Occupational and gender differences.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 519-523.
Background
It is widely suggested that many National Health Service (NHS) workers
experience high levels of minor psychiatric disorder. However,
inadequacies of sampling and measurement in studies to date have
not allowed this suggestion to be properly evaluated.
Method
The present study was designed to overcome these methodological
weaknesses by using a sample of over 11,000 employees from 19 NHS
Trusts and a well-established measure of minor psychiatric disorder
for which there are comparative data.
Results
The findings show that 26.8% of the health service workers reported
significant levels of minor psychiatric disorder, compared with
17.8%of people in the general population. Psychiatric morbidity
was highest among managers,doctors, nurses and professions allied
to medicine, with each of these groups recording higher rates than
their professional counterparts outside the health service.
It was lower among those in support occupations, such as administrative
and ancillary staff. A feature of the findings was that female
doctors and managers showed a much higher prevalence of minor psychiatric
disorder than their male colleagues.
Conclusion
Studies are required to establish the organisational, occupational
and individual determinants of minor psychiatric disorder among
NHS employees.
back
to top
|